Most invention disclosures aren't worth filing. DisclosurePlus tells you which are.
Before you spend $25K finding out the hard way.
Deciding what to file is the most expensive call in IP.
And it's usually made on gut feel. A wasted filing costs tens of thousands. A missed one can cost millions. DisclosurePlus makes that call fast, rigorous, and traceable, so the money follows the inventions that earn it.
It starts where the invention actually starts: a rough write-up, a conference abstract, an inventor conversation. It extracts what's genuinely new, tests it against the prior art, generates a follow-up interview to close the gaps it finds, and drafts a provisional ready for counsel or licensing review.
The four questions that decide a filing.
Eligibility
Whether it's the kind of invention the law lets you patent at all — not an abstract idea or a natural phenomenon.
Novelty
Whether it's genuinely new, or already disclosed in the prior art.
Non-obviousness
Whether it's more than an obvious combination of what's already known — the bar most filings fail.
Enablement
Whether the disclosure actually teaches someone skilled in the field how to make and use it.
Each assessed feature by feature, with the evidence behind every call.
Six deliverables, every run.
Filing recommendation
A clear file, hold, or drop call, with the evidence behind it.
Four statutory assessments
§101, §102, §103, and §112, feature by feature.
Disclosure-gap detection
What's missing from the inventor's write-up, flagged before it costs you.
Drafted provisional application
A filing-ready draft for the inventions worth pursuing.
Full audit trail
Every finding tied to a publication and a specific feature.
Stakeholder-ready exports
Counsel package, executive report, inventor brief.
Seed to provisional.
Start from an inventor interview, a seed document, or both.
Pull out the essential inventive features that define what's actually new.
Run the statutory read across §101, §102, §103, and §112, with prior-art identification.
Generate a targeted follow-up interview to close the gaps the analysis surfaced, then reassess.
Produce a provisional application ready for IP counsel or licensing review.
Novelty is only as good as what you check it against.
Granted patents, published applications, and the journal and book literature the Orchestrator Knowledge Graph draws on — across every major jurisdiction, reaching back fifty years.
DisclosurePlus is the front door to the patent workflow.
Built for university technology transfer offices, corporate IP teams, and outside counsel.
Full validity plus freedom-to-operate passes to Patent Assessment (PIER™).
Patent Assessment →Company resolution and ranked shortlists come from Hoover Search.
Hoover Search →Your unpublished inventions stay unpublished.
We never train our model on what you submit. We never share it between customers. You retain all rights, and you may delete your disclosures on demand. For the most sensitive filings, optional IPFirewall mode keeps documents inside our walls and never sends them to public LLMs.
How we handle your data →Start with the disclosure on your desk.
Run one through DisclosurePlus and see the recommendation, the evidence, and the draft it produces.
See DisclosurePlus on Patenter →